Rachel Cooke writes once more on public libraries in the Observer, and asks if anything has changed since Lamy left and Hodge arrived. She also attacks Yinnon Ezra's idiocies. If reports are correct, Ezra has single-handedly tried to revive the 'should public libraries stock fiction' non-debate, dead and buried even when I was a library school, with his suggestion that, 'we have to ask whether fiction should remain in libraries when most people buy books' . The words attributed to him seem not to be on the Portsmouth News website.
However, she holds up the Coates intervention in Hillingdon as an example, but ignores, or does not know, that this plan depends not only on purchasing savings, but on cuts in staff, both qualified and unqualified. Some money has been found by selling coffee-bar franchises to Starbucks. As an aside, surely they could have found someone better to sell coffee in libraries? I have no objection to coffee shops in libraries, indeed as a library user welcome them, and I doubt if there are any rare books in Hillingdon that need protection from a carelessly wielded macchiatto, but let it be drinkable coffee, not the filth that Starbucks peddle. No matter, the redundant librarians can always retrain as a barista. Hillingdon once, through the Hilligndon project, was a name on every library school students lips. Now it shows us that modern Britain prefers baristas to librarians.
Technorati Tags: hillingdon, publiclibraries, rachelcooke
Recent Comments