Like so many in the profession, I was saddened to hear that Edward Dudley had died. We will be poorer without his intellect and wit.
Edward influenced me long before I met him. I went to what was then the Polytechnic of North London's School of Librarianship and Information Studies for the postgraduate course in 1983, at the Essex Road site. a curious place with its own culture. When we moved over the summer of that year, the postgraduate course following the calendar rather than the academic year, to Ladbroke Grove, we lost something.
Edward had left the Polytechnic, succeeded by Kevin McGarry as Head of School, but the course I followed showed the work Edward had put in to make PNL, as it was then, one of the best library schools in the country. I believe he followed the management principle, too often ignored, of appointing good people, giving them what they needed, and letting them get on with it. The result was eclectic and stimulating, and only Edward could have created a department that contained, in relative harmony, people such as, on the one hand, Derek Langridge of the Cataloguing Research Group, evangelist for Ranganathan and all thing faceted and, on the other, radical believers in the progressive role of the public library such as Jim Hennessy and Bob Barker. I held the position of student representative on the Academic board, and had the privilege of seeing this disparate group debate the future direction of library education. No blows were exchanged. I was also grateful to Edward for his 1953 FLA thesis, which CILIP tell me is still available, and which I must re-read in his honour. Entitled Libraries in the USSR: some post-war developments it was a key resource for my dissertation on Krupskaya, libraries and literacy.
I also became aware of his journalism. At that time New Library World, whose editorship he took on in the year I was at PNL, was a much more interesting read than the Library Association Record. His editorials, in particular, became required reading and when having finished library school, I found myself working in Hendon Reference Library, I would often be distracted from my task of checking in journals onto cards held in metal trays by the latest NLW. These were sent over to headquarters for the Borough Librarian, the Deputy Borough Librarian and the Principal Assistant Borough Librarian to read, but I took some satisfaction in knowing that I had read them first.
Yet at this time I had not met the man. I think we first met at a LIbrary Association AGM. Guy Daines and I, both then active in the infant Library Campaign, proposed a motion at the AGM (in itself unusual in those pre-democratic days) asking the LA to work with the Campaign and the trade union movement to oppose cuts and closures in library services. I am sure we owed a debt to Edward. In the run up to the AGM, the LA leadership, led at that time by George Cunningham, a former MP who had joined the SDP renegades from the Labour Party, lost his seat and so found himself a refuge as our Chief Executive , made fierce oppositional noises to the motion, claiming it would put us in breach of the Royal Charter. We expected a fierce debate at the meeting, and were not sure it was one we could win. When we turned up at the meeting, held I think at Glaziers' Hall, we found that the leadership, I'm sure as a result of Edward's expert string-pulling, had had a complete volte-face and were no longer going to oppose our motion.
After an AGM, Edward approached me. I don't recall the conversation exactly, but I told him of my historical interests, particularly in the scientists who in the 1920s, 30s and 40s joined or were close to the Communist Party of Great Britain, people like J.B.S. Haldane, J.D. Bernal, whose post-war work on the information needs of scientific researchers bears re-reading sixty-five years later, Lancelot Hogden and Hyman Levy. Not only did Edward know these eminent figures, he had served many of them in the branch library he worked in, Belsize Park in what was then the borough of Hampstead and, I hope I recall correctly, was a member of the same Communist Party branch. Edward discovered my interest in the literature of that period and would often suggest books to me, generously asking if I had a copy of a particular Left Book Club edition of which he had a spare.
I also became a willing recruit to his campaign to bring a little democracy to the LA, and then CILIP. Of an evening the telephone would ring. It would be Edward. Would I consider seconding a motion at the next AGM, proposing the dangerously radical notion that Presidents should be elected by the whole membership, not just council? Of course I would. And I was invited to attend, in what capacity I was never quite sure, meetings in his and Kate's Barbican flat to prepare the CILIP in London regional branch as the new organisation came into being. He remained a moving force in London affairs right up to his death.
I have further cause to be grateful to him. When I left health libraries for a time in 2006, I also stood down from the Editorial Board of Health Information and Libraries Journal. I missed it, because there is nothing like involvement in a journal to teach library and information people about how the material we organise and make available comes into being. Quite out of the blue, in 2008, I was invited to joint the Editorial Board of the Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, JOLIS, which Edward had been instrumental in founding, persuading the LA of the need for a theoretical journal,. Once more, I could enjoy his contributions to a debate, always fresh, never clichéd or formulaic.
He was always keen to understand new technologies. He read my blog, I know, and would sometimes refer to it in his column in Update. At the famous CILIP 2 open meeting of Council in 2009, addressed by Phil Bradley, who I heard yesterday won the election for Vice-President, he approached me afterwards. What was my assessment of this Web 2.0 carry-on? I wrote at the time that I made some vague and semi-coherent noises about how I was interested in the aspects of Web 2.0 which seem to offer greater opportunity for democracy. He thought briefly. 'Yes,' he replied, 'and subversion'. I trust we will all be as subversive as we possibly can, in his memory.
Recent Comments